|
Post by Rocky on Aug 14, 2012 10:32:41 GMT -8
Keep discussing what you would like. It would be nice to get every GMs opinion. I'll be back tonight with a decision on what will be done. Both GM spots have been filled also.
|
|
|
Post by Canucks on Aug 14, 2012 10:36:35 GMT -8
no interest in a restart here.
|
|
|
Post by Nordiques on Aug 14, 2012 10:37:02 GMT -8
I honestly don't know how anyone is saying to restart. One team has kovalchuk, and e staal, the other has karlsson and h.sedin. Its not that bad lol. What's the big deal. Pause the draft get 2 new owners let the new lightning owner decide if he wants to keep iginala, if not he can take someone else. And have Calgary pick up in the 3rd round. problem solved One objection is the fact that one person determined selection for two teams and with that influenced the direction of the draft that may have been different had certain players been available. The cap obligation two rounds in might also be a reasonable cause to allow an incoming GM the means to determine his own budget strategy. I could see strong objection even if we were just 5 rounds in, but we're in a position with the skill of most of the GMs here to mitigate any real difficulties.
|
|
|
Post by Canucks on Aug 14, 2012 11:01:11 GMT -8
the new gms havint missed much,why restart the entire thing because of 1 douchebag?new gms,would you consider exchanging players that are on your club with whats remaining?restarting the draft seems pretty brutal.the two clubs arent crappy by any means.he may have selected the players for hiw two teams,but there top fantasy players,i mean come on,thy could have been left with scraps.if they didnt have good players i would have a diffrent opinion,but they do,and to restart because of a glitch,doesn work for me.just my two cents.tbay really fucked us over.
|
|
|
Post by Nordiques on Aug 14, 2012 11:06:50 GMT -8
the new gms havint missed much,why restart the entire thing because of 1 douchebag?new gms,would you consider exchanging players that are on your club with whats remaining?restarting the draft seems pretty brutal.the two clubs arent crappy by any means.he may have selected the players for hiw two teams,but there top fantasy players,i mean come on,thy could have been left with scraps.if they didnt have good players i would have a diffrent opinion,but they do,and to restart because of a glitch,doesn work for me.just my two cents.tbay really fucked us over. He sure did. The effect of one guy cheating.
|
|
|
Post by North Stars on Aug 14, 2012 11:08:25 GMT -8
the new gms havint missed much,why restart the entire thing because of 1 douchebag?new gms,would you consider exchanging players that are on your club with whats remaining?restarting the draft seems pretty brutal.the two clubs arent crappy by any means.he may have selected the players for hiw two teams,but there top fantasy players,i mean come on,thy could have been left with scraps.if they didnt have good players i would have a diffrent opinion,but they do,and to restart because of a glitch,doesn work for me.just my two cents.tbay really fucked us over. He sure did. The effect of one guy cheating. May be the most disinterested cheater i have ever come across
|
|
|
Post by Nordiques on Aug 14, 2012 11:10:19 GMT -8
the new gms havint missed much,why restart the entire thing because of 1 douchebag?new gms,would you consider exchanging players that are on your club with whats remaining?restarting the draft seems pretty brutal.the two clubs arent crappy by any means.he may have selected the players for hiw two teams,but there top fantasy players,i mean come on,thy could have been left with scraps.if they didnt have good players i would have a diffrent opinion,but they do,and to restart because of a glitch,doesn work for me.just my two cents.tbay really fucked us over. How does picking other players available in the Draft not screw other GMs over though? It's a messy business, this. I think the question should be considered is it fair, 2 rounds in to hamstring new GMs when an easy fix is available with minimal damage....relatively speaking. And let's keep in context, we haven't done a lot of work by any means, simple math informs us there. And as well, these GMs wanting to restart -- and it's a partial restart -- shouldnt be held against them for any reason let alone given their willingness to commit.
|
|
|
Post by Nordiques on Aug 14, 2012 11:10:44 GMT -8
He sure did. The effect of one guy cheating. May be the most disinterested cheater i have ever come across Hah. Too true.
|
|
|
Post by Canucks on Aug 14, 2012 11:32:59 GMT -8
what a tool.ya im really happy with my picks,and a restart sucks,but i hope the gms in the later rounds are ready to lose there picks and redraft as well. so instead of not upssetting the new gms,were opening a whole new can down here at the bottom...once again...thank you old tampa gm..the top order of the draft shouldnt really care,you basically just have to make one change when the draft comes back down,for the guys in the middle and end its a little diffrent.thats like us reversing the draft order...im all for that
|
|
|
Post by North Stars on Aug 14, 2012 11:34:46 GMT -8
what a tool.ya im really happy with my picks,and a restart sucks,but i hope the gms in the later rounds are ready to lose there picks and redraft as well. so instead of not upssetting the new gms,were opening a whole new can down here at the bottom...once again...thank you old tampa gm..the top order of the draft shouldnt really care,you basically just have to make one change when the draft comes back down,for the guys in the middle and end its a little diffrent.thats like us reversing the draft order...im all for that redrafting isn't an option.....we all played our cards imho
|
|
|
Post by Canucks on Aug 14, 2012 11:35:21 GMT -8
agreed.
|
|
|
Post by Nordiques on Aug 14, 2012 11:37:30 GMT -8
what a tool.ya im really happy with my picks,and a restart sucks,but i hope the gms in the later rounds are ready to lose there picks and redraft as well. so instead of not upssetting the new gms,were opening a whole new can down here at the bottom...once again...thank you old tampa gm..the top order of the draft shouldnt really care,you basically just have to make one change when the draft comes back down,for the guys in the middle and end its a little diffrent.thats like us reversing the draft order...im all for that It wouldn't be like that at all. It would be a partial restart. Teams 1 - 8 keep their picks, and from there we would proceed at a much quicker pace. It's unfortunate but in the overall scheme of things, we afford incoming GMs at this, our start, with at least the same consideration we would want Id think. And besides, we're still hashing out ideas...Nothing's final yet.
|
|
|
Post by Canucks on Aug 14, 2012 11:42:39 GMT -8
ya thats all fun and games since 8 and under dont lose there picks.for us down here,its a total restart.if were redoing the draft lets restart the whole thing,draft positions and all,thats the only fair way to do this since the top of the order wont change.untill rnd 2.
|
|
|
Post by rockiesgm on Aug 14, 2012 11:43:49 GMT -8
I have narrowed it down to 3 options now as to what is going to happen. 1. Re-draft 2. New GMs take over teams, everything stays as is. 3. New GMs take over teams, and are allowed to switch their picks for any available players, then continue the draft. (Mini 2 Round draft between them) option number 3 seems to be the most fair for everyone in the league. The new gms and those of us getting screwed by this.
|
|
|
Post by Blues on Aug 14, 2012 11:46:00 GMT -8
ya thats all fun and games since 8 and under dont lose there picks.for us down here,its a total restart.if were redoing the draft lets restart the whole thing,draft positions and all,thats the only fair way to do this since the top of the order wont change.untill rnd 2. I kinda agree with this. But i'm fine with anything.
|
|
Jets
Mike Richards
Posts: 130
|
Post by Jets on Aug 14, 2012 13:38:12 GMT -8
ya thats all fun and games since 8 and under dont lose there picks.for us down here,its a total restart.if were redoing the draft lets restart the whole thing,draft positions and all,thats the only fair way to do this since the top of the order wont change.untill rnd 2. Well said. If we aren't going with option 2 or 3 than this is the only other way I'd be satisfied.
|
|
|
Post by lightning on Aug 14, 2012 14:13:45 GMT -8
ya thats all fun and games since 8 and under dont lose there picks.for us down here,its a total restart.if were redoing the draft lets restart the whole thing,draft positions and all,thats the only fair way to do this since the top of the order wont change.untill rnd 2. Well said. If we aren't going with option 2 or 3 than this is the only other way I'd be satisfied. So lets do it! Let's start this thing
|
|
|
Post by Nordiques on Aug 14, 2012 14:17:25 GMT -8
ya thats all fun and games since 8 and under dont lose there picks.for us down here,its a total restart.if were redoing the draft lets restart the whole thing,draft positions and all,thats the only fair way to do this since the top of the order wont change.untill rnd 2. Well said. If we aren't going with option 2 or 3 than this is the only other way I'd be satisfied. Why would the whole thing need to be redone? The fault began at pick 9. the first 8 picks as far as Im concerned are clean, had no effect on the rest of the draft. Same can't be said picks 9 and on...
|
|
|
Post by Nordiques on Aug 14, 2012 14:29:06 GMT -8
Let's also consider we're at the front end of a long draft, and that ultimately, the new GMs coming in will be dedicating hours upon hours to the rest of the team's life. Don't we owe that kind of prospective dedication the right to take on salaries and players they would like to have?
|
|
|
Post by Canucks on Aug 14, 2012 14:39:51 GMT -8
know what guys,lets just do what ever is faster.i just wanna get drafting so ill just go either way here.
|
|